![star wars revisited mp4 star wars revisited mp4](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/z63nPDQX_Uw/maxresdefault.jpg)
The likely response of an adversary to any perceived missile defense would be increasing offensive intercontinental missile forces, which would leave the United States in a worse position than before. Countermeasures, moreover, are far less expensive. Countermeasures are well within the capability of developing nations that could deploy missiles. National Intelligence Estimate concluded that making and deploying countermeasures is technically far simpler than building and deploying defensive capabilities. The defensive systems are highly vulnerable to inexpensive countermeasures, and there has never been a defensive system that could distinguish between warheads and decoys, which emit almost identical signals. military planners gave it no weight in their targeting strategy.
![star wars revisited mp4 star wars revisited mp4](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/FeNquC2MMIU/maxresdefault.jpg)
When the Soviets had a missile defense around Moscow in the 1960s, U.S.
![star wars revisited mp4 star wars revisited mp4](https://img.youtube.com/vi/HcZ9kQ1h-ZY/0.jpg)
Most tests have been failures, and no test has been conducted under realistic conditions. Over the past sixty years, the United States has invested hundreds of billions of dollars in the research and development of missile defense. There is probably no greater illusion in the field of national security than the idea of credible missile defense. The North Korean and Iranian scenarios are quite fanciful, but then again the exaggeration of the threat from the Soviet Union and China in the 1980s was equally far-fetched. According to the Washington Post, the United States would put high-powered lasers on drones flying off the Korean coast and create a third ground-based missile interceptor site in the United States to defend against Iran. Unlike Reagan’s “Star Wars,” which was designed to protect against a strategic attack from Russia or China, Trump’s version is oriented to stopping an attack from so-called rogue nations such as Iran or North Korea. Congress was skeptical of Reagan’s “Star Wars” in the 1980s, but the current Congress has been unwilling to challenge the outrageous national security policies of the Trump administration. Trump plans to go further than Reagan by deploying missile defense in Europe and Asia to protect U.S. Trump’s Pentagon is reviving ideas that were abandoned after the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991, including weapons that can shoot down missiles from space and high energy lasers that can destroy missiles shortly after they are launched, the so-called boost phase. In the wake of record defense spending the creation of a Space Force that would violate the Outer Space Treaty agreed to fifty years ago the abrogation of the Intermediate-range Nuclear Forces Treaty from thirty years ago and the chaos of random decision making for use of force, the Trump administration is returning to the madness of President Ronald Reagan’s “Star Wars” idea with costly and ineffective ideas regarding missile-defense technologies. Donald Trump and his “war cabinet” have struck again.